I'm on my way to England for a few days. A bit of a whirlwind trip, but I expect it'll be productive.
Loaded up my Tube map and National Rail schedule on my iPhone. The new travel practice: adjusting your collection of apps.
More from England.
« April 2010 | Main | June 2010 »
I'm on my way to England for a few days. A bit of a whirlwind trip, but I expect it'll be productive.
Loaded up my Tube map and National Rail schedule on my iPhone. The new travel practice: adjusting your collection of apps.
More from England.
May 30, 2010 at 12:21 PM in England, Travel | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 28, 2010 at 07:40 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 27, 2010 at 07:40 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
Steve Eisman, "the outspoken investor whose huge wager against the subprime mortgage market was chronicled by author Michael Lewis in his bestselling book The Big Short, talking about the for-profit education industry:
Until recently, I thought that there would never again be an opportunity to be involved with an industry as socially destructive and morally bankrupt as the subprime mortgage industry. I was wrong. The for-profit education industry has proven equal to the task.
As Mother Jones elaborates,
Driving much of the growth, Eisman explained, was the sector's easy access to federally guaranteed debt through Title IV student loans. In 2009, he said, for-profit educators raked in almost one-quarter of the $89 billion in available Title IV loans and grants, despite having only 10 percent of the nation's postsecondary students.
Eisman attributes the industry's success to a Bush administration that stripped away regulations and increased the private sector's access to public funds. "The government, the students, and the taxpayer bear all the risk and the for-profit industry reaps all the rewards," Eisman said. "This is similar to the subprime mortgage sector in that the subprime originators bore far less risk than the investors in their mortgage paper."...
Another similarity between subprime lending and for-profit education is this, Eisman said: Both push low-income Americans into something they can't afford.... [Finally], the industry's era of massive profits—ITT is more profitable on a margin basis than Apple, he notes—are about to end, thanks to new government regulations in the pipeline.
Wonderful.
May 27, 2010 at 07:04 PM in Current Affairs, Postacademic | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
A friend introduced me to Hipstamatic a few days ago, and I've been hooked on it. I've created a Flickr set of Hipstamatic pictures.

via flickr
I'm not sure what's so compelling about the program. I think the ability to play with combinations of lenses and film and flahses (or rather "lenses" and "film" and "flashes") and the clever fake history that they've created around the technology has a lot to do with it.

via flickr
The fact that it's also kind of hard to use at times makes it more interesting. It's not clear what you're going to get when you take a picture.

via flickr
Anyway, I recommend it.
May 26, 2010 at 09:47 PM in Gadgets | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 26, 2010 at 07:42 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
A while ago I wrote about reinventing academic talks. It got me thinking about how to better design workshops or conferences that bring together scholars or scientists (who, broadly speaking, like to think about stuff) with policy people, corporate strategists, and military people (who, broadly speaking, also like to think, but really like to DO).
It's a space I've been exploring in my consulting practice this past year, and I just posted a piece on Future2 on the opportunities we now have to reinvent events on the academic / real-world boundary.
May 26, 2010 at 02:22 PM in Conference, Postacademic, Work | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
I noticed a traffic spike on the blog, thanks to Lexi Lord's essay on post-academic life in the recent Chronicle of Higher Education (thanks, Lexi!). She talks about how she decided to leave a tenure-track position, and her discovery of the fact that you don't have to be an academic to have an interesting intellectual life (and indeed, can have a more interesting one if you're not a professor):
Because I live in a large city, as opposed to the small college towns where I was a professor, I live in a world of museums, lectures, public seminars, extraordinary bookstores, fantastic archives, and libraries. I live in a place that has racial as well as ethnic diversity. All of those factors encourage me to think about historical problems in a rigorous albeit different fashion from how I saw them in academe....
I live where a lot of archives are—which makes research easier than it was in academe. I write and publish. My new book, researched and written completely outside academe, was just published by Johns Hopkins University Press.
Since leaving academe, I have continued to endorse the belief that being an intellectual entails analyzing and understanding issues from multiple angles. I hope that in advising their undergraduates, academics will encourage their students to share that view. More important, I hope faculty members will encourage students to do informational interviews and extensive research on career options—before entering a Ph.D. program, which is, after all, only one path to the life of the mind.
This is always good advice, but it's especially timely, given that last night I had an experience that reminded me of the increased feasibility of pursuing academic projects outside the university.
I recently became interested in the concept of unintended consequences, and how the term is used to either describe or excuse the unexpected. It would be obvious to start such an essay with "a Raymond Williams Keywords-like analysis of its history," and last night I decided to poke around a little bit and see if I could find some early uses.
A little time on Google Scholar turned up the fact that Robert Merton wrote an article about the term in 1936, and died with a book on unintended consequences still unfinished-- a warning that I should be very tactical in how I approach the subject. (The fact that Google Scholar has "Stand on the shoulders of giants" as its motto warms my heart, since Merton wrote a book on the phrase.) That took a few minutes.
I then jumped over to the Stanford Library Web site, to see if Poole's Index of 19th Century Periodicals was online. When I was writing my dissertation, I spent a LOT OF TIME with Poole's-- it was an invaluable resource, and I remember many hours in the Penn and UC Berkeley libraries, looking for article citations, then tracking them down in the stacks. Instead, I quickly found the 19C Index, an online repository / directory that includes Poole's, but also a number of other 19th century indexes, publications, scanned magazines, etc.
For the next couple hours, I tracked down various combinations of unintended, unexpected, and unanticipated, and effects or consequences; by bedtime, I had a couple pages' worth of material written (most of it is footnotes and quotations, of course).
All this happened on my couch, with the "Biggest Loser" finale in the background.
I wouldn't give up those days spent in the library for anything; and I still really enjoy going to libraries to read and write. But the point of the story is this: that while fifteen years ago (when I did it) successfully leaving academia but remaining intellectual required geography and attitude-- I could do it because I was living in Chicago, Lexi was in DC, and we both were willing to keep a growth mindset about the next phase of our lives-- today, resources like 19C make it even easier to do serious scholarly work-- at least preliminary scholarly writing-- without being close to libraries. I'm about three miles away from Green Library, but with kids, work, and other stuff, it's hard to get there, and impossible to just dash over to the reference section to check up on something (as I could do when I was single and living a mile from the Berkeley campus).
So what Lexi argues in her recent piece, and what I argued years ago, is more true than ever: the raw resources for pursuing academic projects are more accessible and portable than ever. It still often requires maintaining some kind of connection with an academic institution-- my Stanford affiliation gets me access to the online databases like 19C and JSTOR-- and you still have to manage all the logistical stuff required to carve out time for yourself, but the Web at least seriously lowers the barriers to getting access to the resources necessary to support a real intellectual life.
I know that projects like JSTOR are intended to support academics, but I think it's even more valuable for people who are doing serious intellectual work but who aren't academics. These services were designed to support scholarship is doing that... but the most profound benefits aren't going to the people they were originally designed for.
Hey. That's an unintended consequence.
May 26, 2010 at 02:07 PM in Postacademic, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 25, 2010 at 07:42 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
This caught on Failbooking.

May 25, 2010 at 01:19 PM in Devices, Sports, Tagging | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
Sign and Sight and Eurozine. Both good for those of us whose reading knowledge of German, Norweigian, Romanian, Swedish, Danish, and Polish is rusty. From their about pages:
signandsight.com translates outstanding articles by non-English language authors bringing them to a worldwide audience. signandsight.com gathers voices from across Europe on a variety of topics, aiming to foster trans-European debates and the creation of a European public sphere.
Eurozine is a network of European cultural journals, linking up more than 75 partner journals and just as many associated magazines and institutions from nearly all European countries. Eurozine is also a netmagazine which publishes outstanding articles from its partner journals with additional translations into one of the major European languages.
May 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM in Europe, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
Peter Bregman reports on multitasking and its perils:
Doing several things at once is a trick we play on ourselves, thinking we're getting more done. In reality, our productivity goes down by as much as 40%. We don't actually multitask. We switch-task, rapidly shifting from one thing to another, interrupting ourselves unproductively, and losing time in the process.
You might think you're different, that you've done it so much you've become good at it. Practice makes perfect and all that.
But you'd be wrong. Research shows that heavy multitaskers are less competent at doing several things at once than light multitaskers. In other words, in contrast to almost everything else in your life, the more you multitask, the worse you are at it. Practice, in this case, works against you.
I decided to do an experiment. For one week I would do no multitasking and see what happened. What techniques would help? Could I sustain a focus on one thing at a time for that long?
For the most part, I succeeded. If I was on the phone, all I did was talk or listen on the phone. In a meeting I did nothing but focus on the meeting. Any interruptions — email, a knock on the door — I held off until I finished what I was working on.
May 24, 2010 at 09:45 PM in Web/Tech, Work | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
I passed into the potter’s house of clay, and saw the craftsman busy at his wheel, turning out pots and jars fashioned from the heads of kings, and the feet of beggars. (Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, via 360 Degrees of Mindful Eating)
May 24, 2010 at 09:13 PM in Quotes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 24, 2010 at 07:42 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 23, 2010 at 07:37 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 21, 2010 at 07:40 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
Our brains have evolved to take the quickest and most efficient route to a decision, based on experience and a set of innate and unconscious rules developed since birth to negotiate our physical and social environment. Start considering lots of other information and variables, and the brain slows down or falters. Simplicity, writes Gigerenzer, is an evolutionary adaptation to uncertainty: "A complex problem demands a complex solution, so we are told. In fact, in unpredictable environments, the opposite is true.""
May 19, 2010 at 07:41 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
This from Ezra Klein, who is rapidly becoming indispensable, despite just having turned thirteen:
One in every 10 mortgage holders is now officially "delinquent" -- that is to say, late on at least one payment. That's an all-time high. And that's not the only record we're setting: About one in 20 loans is now in foreclosure, which also qualifies as a first. All in all, about 15 percent of mortgage-holders are now delinquent or in foreclosure....
It's a reminder, if nothing else, that the trigger for the financial crisis was the realization that homeowners were going to begin defaulting in record numbers and the assets based on their future payments were not safe. It was not the realization that that had already happened. Instead, it's happening now. So though the financial crisis seems to have largely played itself out, the housing crisis isn't anywhere near its end [emphasis added].
May 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 18, 2010 at 07:41 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
The study finds a common statistical distribution for insurgency attacks that is significantly different to the distribution of attacks in traditional wars. This finding supports the belief that insurgent wars represent "fourth generation warfare" with different dynamics from conventional wars.
"Despite the many different discussions of various wars, different historical features, tribes, geography and cause, we find that the way humans fight modern (present and probably future) wars is the same," he says. "Just like traffic patterns in Tokyo, London and Miami are pretty much the same."
May 14, 2010 at 07:38 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 13, 2010 at 07:40 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 11, 2010 at 07:40 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
This line delivered at Emory University's commencement (via Talking Points Memo):
I was also going to give a graduation speech in Arizona this weekend. But with my accent, I was afraid they would try to deport me.
I recently watched Pumping Iron-- I checked it out of the library, and meant to watch it in a more ironic spirit, but it turned out to be kind of captivating.
What impressed me was, first, how much Arnold dominated the field; and second, how many of the guys in the documentary talked about being runty little kids. None of the competition-level bodybuilders said, "Yeah, I always huge as a kid, and I loved beating people up, so this seemed like a natural sport for me." Doubtless there are guys who do it for that reason, but that doesn't give you the drive necessary to become really good.
May 11, 2010 at 08:24 AM in Quotes | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 10, 2010 at 07:45 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 09, 2010 at 07:35 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
Virginia Heffernan laments the demise of datebooks like the Filofax:
It’s hard to remember, surveying my dull Google version (“parents in town,” “book club”), that a Filofax was also a place for plot arcs, self-invention and self-regulation. It was, in every sense, a diary — a forward-running record, unlike backward-running blogs. The quality of the paper stock, the slot for the pen, the blank but substantial cover, the hints of grand possibilities that came with the inserts — all of these inspired not just introspection but also the joining of history: the mapping of an individual life onto the grand old Gregorian-calendar template....
[N]ow that I’ve shelved my Filofax in favor of a calendar program that seems somehow to flatten existence, I realize that another year is passing without my building up the compact book of a year’s worth of Filofax pages that, every December, I used to wrap in a rubber band and put on a shelf, just as my new refills came in the mail.
If there is one thing we've discovered about print media, especially in the wake of the disappearance of some artifact (card catalogs, the encyclopedia, etc.), is that readers and users don't treat print media merely as inefficient carriers of information that wanted to be digital (or free, or expensive, as Stewart Brand put it), but developed all kinds of other uses for print that increased their utility, were taken for granted, and tended to be overlooked by engineers. Engineers looked at the Filofax and saw a digital calendar-in-waiting; in Heffernan's hands, in contrast, it was "a place for plot arcs, self-invention and self-regulation. It was, in every sense, a diary — a forward-running record, unlike backward-running blogs."
We don't just act on information or media; we interact with it, and the character of those interactions, as much as the information itself, define our relationships with media. One reason I still prefer printed books to digital is that it's difficult to annotate digital books in a way I find satisfactory: when I'm reviewing a book, or using it in my work, I need to be able to underline, annotate, add Post-Its, and make notes-- to document my dialogue with or reflections on the book. (This goes far beyond the kind of annotations you can make on ebooks today, and a world away from leaving comments on blogs, or hitting the "Like" button on a Web page.) This kind of reading is more like a martial art than the quiet, interior activity that many people think of when they think about "reading." And while I don't do it with everything-- I never got the calendar bug, for example-- there are a few activities in which the affordances of print media support practices and interactions that electronic media cannot.
May 09, 2010 at 10:33 AM in Devices, Experiences and practices, Notes / Reading | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
This article began as an effort to identify challenges the U.S. Army must prepare to face, but I soon realized that many of those challenges are connected to the other armed forces, the interagency, and the broader U.S. Government. Therefore, I address elements of our national power beyond just the military. The complexities of today's national security environment demand that we reevaluate missions across the U.S. Government, embrace the requirements for full-spectrum operations, and preserve our most important military principles while adjusting our organizations and values development."
May 06, 2010 at 07:40 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 05, 2010 at 07:38 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
From High Clearing, urging calm about the Times Square bombing attempt:
I’m no explosives expert, but I know that somehow poor and illiterate guerrilla fighters around the globe manage to build improvised bombs that actually work.... In the past, I have wrung my hands in fear of what my countrymen will do if Islamic terrorists ever succeed in setting off a bunch of car bombs. While I still worry about that, I now worry less. It appears that the terrorists we’re facing at home these days are basically the Generation Veal of terrorists.
May 05, 2010 at 11:59 AM in Quotes | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 04, 2010 at 07:39 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
Julia Turner has an excellent article in Slate about hand-drawn maps:
Homemade maps also play with scale in fascinating ways. Paul Stiff, a professor of information design who's been collecting hand-drawn maps for decades, reviewed all the submitted maps for Slate, and he was intrigued by the one below, which was drawn by an Australian architect to direct his daughter from Brisbane to his farm. Stiff notes: "If you compare this with a topographical map, you'll see that he's compressed the scale astonishingly." There's less detail closer to home, where roads are familiar, Stiff says, "but the scale expands the nearer we get to the destination because we need more information in places that are new to us."
Good hand-drawn maps do more than edit out useless details. They often ignore the mapmaking convention that puts north at the top.
Handmade maps also tend toward straight lines and right angles, a phenomenon spatial psychologists refer to as "rectilinear normalization." The world is full of squiggly roads that intersect at oblique angles. When we envision space, though, we tend to reduce such complexities to relatively simple geometric forms.
[H]omemade maps can be better than professional ones at eliminating extraneous detail, playing with scale, simplifying complex forms, and mapping remote terrain or interiors. Indeed, some computer scientists have examined whether professional route-mapping algorithms could produce maps more like the ones we draw. MacArthur grant winner Maneesh Agrawala developed software called Line Drive that works along these lines, making computer maps more legible by distorting scale and straightening out bendy roads. Like Paul Stiff, Agrawala studies information display, and he became interested in Web-based driving directions when he noticed the limitations of their maps: "They almost never produce a map that I can actually use to get to the destination," Agrawala told me. "Really the text directions are what I end up using."
May 03, 2010 at 11:49 PM in Gadgets | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 03, 2010 at 07:38 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
Face painting at the Spring Fair!
May 02, 2010 at 11:38 AM in Peninsula School | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
May 01, 2010 at 07:37 PM in Del.icio.us | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
|

I write about people, technology, and the worlds they make.
I'm a senior consultant at Strategic Business Insights, a Menlo Park, CA consulting and research firm. I also have two academic appointments: I'm a visitor at the Peace Innovation Lab at Stanford University, and an Associate Fellow at Oxford University's Saïd Business School. (I also have profiles on Linked In, Google Scholar and Academia.edu.)
I began thinking seriously about contemplative computing in the winter of 2011 while a Visiting Researcher in the Socio-Digital Systems Group at Microsoft Research, Cambridge. I wanted to figure out how to design information technologies and user experiences that promote concentration and deep focused thinking, rather than distract you, fracture your attention, and make you feel dumb. You can read about it on my Contemplative Computing Blog.
My book on contemplative computing, The Distraction Addiction, will be published by Little, Brown and Company in 2013. (It will also appear in Dutch and Russian.)

My latest book, and the first book from the contemplative computing project. The Distraction Addiction will appear in summer 2013, published by Little, Brown and Co.. (You can pre-order it through Amazon or IndieBound now, though!)

My first book, Empire and the Sun: Victorian Solar Eclipse Expeditions, was published with Stanford University Press in 2002 (order via Amazon).
IN PROGRESS
IN PRESS
PUBLISHED IN 2012
PUBLISHED IN 2011
A Banquet of Consequences: Living in the “Nobody-Could-Have-Predicted” Era.
Using Futures 2.0 to Manage Intractable Futures: The Case of Weight Loss
Thinking Big: Large Media, Creativity, and Collaboration [pdf]
Citizen Satellites (with Bob Twiggs)
PUBLISHED IN 2010
Feasting at the Banquet of Consequence
Futures 2.0: Rethinking the Discipline
Paper Spaces: Visualizing the Future
Social Scanning: Improving Futures Through Web 2.0
Global Scenarios: Their Current State and Future
PUBLISHED IN 2009
Future Knowledge Ecosystems: The Next 20 Years of Technology-Led Economic Development





Recent Comments